A successful acquisition starts well before a letter of intent is signed. Buyers need a clear acquisition strategy, a disciplined approach to finding and evaluating targets, realistic valuation and financing assumptions, and a plan for diligence and integration.
The answers below cover the key questions companies, private equity firms, family offices, and other acquirers encounter when pursuing a business acquisition.
A proprietary deal is one sourced directly rather than through a marketed process — the buyer approached the owner, and no auction is running. It matters because price in an auction is set by the most aggressive bidder, whereas price in a bilateral conversation is set by what the two parties agree is fair. Off-market transactions typically close at lower multiples and with less competitive pressure on terms. The cost is effort: proprietary deal flow requires screening large numbers of companies and approaching owners who have not decided to sell, which is why buyers either build a corporate development function or hire one.
Carefully, and usually not directly. Most owners worth approaching are not for sale, and a clumsy approach from a competitor can damage a commercial relationship or start a rumor that reaches their employees. The conventional route is an intermediary making a discreet, specific approach that explains why this particular business fits a strategy — generic "are you interested in selling" letters are ignored. Using an advisor also preserves the buyer's optionality: the buyer's identity stays undisclosed until there is mutual interest, so nothing is lost if the conversation ends. Where a direct relationship already exists, a personal conversation works, but the price expectation set in that first conversation is very hard to move afterwards.
DBD Investment Bank starts from the buyer's investment thesis and works a funnel that begins with thousands of companies. The initial screen filters on size, sector, geography, and strategic fit; a qualification pass then assesses revenue, EBITDA margin, growth, and ownership structure to produce a shortlist, ranked into A, B, and C priority tiers with the client. Outreach on a typical mandate runs to hundreds of exploratory calls and more than 100 target intelligence dossiers before diligence begins on the priority tier. On one buy-side mandate for a packaging manufacturer owned by a European family office, DBD approached more than 200 vetted targets before completing the acquisition of a specialty supplier that internalized roughly 25% of the client's variable costs.
It means DBD Investment Bank functions as the acquirer's corporate development department — sourcing, screening, diligence, structuring, and execution — for companies that do not have an internal M&A team and do not want to hire one. A middle-market buyer usually cannot justify permanent deal staff, but an acquisition program still needs someone evaluating thousands of companies, keeping a tiered pipeline current, and running diligence to institutional standard. DBD provides that function on an engagement basis and stays on across successive acquisitions rather than deal by deal, which is how a buy-and-build program gets sequenced around one or two platform acquisitions instead of assembled opportunistically.
DBD Investment Bank acts as an outsourced deal team for acquirers: it defines the acquisition thesis and criteria, screens and prioritizes targets, approaches owners discreetly on the client's behalf, runs valuation and diligence, structures the transaction, arranges financing, and manages the process to close. Because DBD approaches targets as an intermediary, a buyer can explore a competitor, a supplier, or a customer without exposing its own interest if the conversation goes nowhere. The firm also assesses post-merger integration before a deal signs, on the view that choosing the right target and integrating it are the same problem. Clients have included corporate buyers, private equity funds, and family offices.
Systematically, not opportunistically. The businesses that come to you through brokers or bankers are already being marketed, which means you are competing on price against everyone else who received the same teaser. The alternative is to define what you are looking for precisely — size, sector, geography, and the specific capability or market you want — then screen the whole universe against those criteria and approach the owners directly, most of whom are not actively selling. That approach reaches better assets with less competition, but it takes real research effort: thousands of companies screened to produce a shortlist worth pursuing.
A synergy is value created by combining two businesses that neither could produce alone, and it comes in three forms: cost synergies from removing duplication, revenue synergies from cross-selling or market access, and capital synergies from rationalizing assets or working capital. Cost synergies are the reliable ones — a duplicated function is a line in a budget you can point to. Revenue synergies are where buyers most often overpay, because they depend on customer behavior after the deal rather than on arithmetic. A useful discipline is to underwrite the transaction on cost synergies only, and treat any revenue upside as a bonus rather than a justification.
Scope diligence to two things: the thesis, and the standard kill list. The thesis work verifies why you believe this creates value — recurring revenue, a customer relationship, a capability, a cost you will remove — and it should go deep. The kill list is separate and applies regardless of thesis: quality of earnings, sales and payroll tax exposure across states, worker classification, change-of-control consents in the largest contracts, pension and benefit liabilities, environmental where real property is involved, insurance claims history, and a clean capitalization table. In lower-middle-market acquisitions of founder-owned businesses, the seven-figure surprises come almost entirely from that second list rather than the first. Over-diligencing a small acquisition wastes money; skipping the kill list because an item was off-thesis is how buyers get hurt after closing.
Value it twice: as a standalone business and as part of yours. The standalone number comes from comparable transactions and the target's own cash flows, and it establishes what any buyer would pay. The second adds the synergies specific to you — costs that disappear on combination, revenue from cross-selling, purchasing leverage, capacity you no longer need to build. The gap between the two is your negotiating room, and the discipline is keeping it rather than bidding it away. In practice, three things set the ceiling in the lower middle market: what the debt market will lend against the combined cash flow, the entry multiple against the exit multiple you can defend, and the pro forma multiple after synergies are actually delivered. A buyer who pays the full synergy-inclusive value has handed the entire benefit of the transaction to the seller.
They solve different problems. Buying a competitor consolidates market share and usually produces the largest and most certain cost synergies, because the duplication is obvious — but it invites the most scrutiny, and integrating two organizations that were rivals is culturally hard. Buying a supplier internalizes a cost you currently pay someone else's margin on, protects access to a critical input, and is often easier to integrate because the two businesses already work together. One DBD buy-side mandate acquired a client's own supplier, internalizing roughly 25% of the client's variable cost base and delivering a double-digit EBITDA improvement straight to the bottom line.
A platform acquisition is the first and largest purchase in a strategy — it needs to be big enough to carry management, systems, and infrastructure that later acquisitions can plug into. An add-on, or bolt-on, is a smaller business acquired afterwards and folded into the platform. The distinction is economic as much as descriptive: platforms are priced on their standalone quality and command full multiples, while add-ons are typically cheaper because they are too small to attract institutional buyers of their own. Add-ons have accounted for roughly three-quarters of U.S. private equity buyouts by deal count in recent years, which is why so many mid-sized businesses now find their most likely buyer is a platform rather than a fund.
A buy-and-build strategy acquires one substantial business as a platform and adds smaller ones over time. The economics rest on two levers: add-ons are usually bought at lower multiples than the platform commands, and shared overhead means each arrives at a higher margin. It is the dominant approach in fragmented industries. Two things determine whether it works. Integration — a group of businesses bought but never genuinely combined carries all the cost and none of the benefit, and an eventual buyer values it as a collection rather than a company, with pro forma adjustments discounted in diligence. And the credit agreement: what you can actually buy is governed by the permitted acquisition basket your lender negotiated, not by your thesis, which is a constraint worth checking before building a pipeline.
From engagement to closing, five to seven months is typical for a single acquisition once a target has been identified — but the search that precedes it can run considerably longer. A structured buy-side program usually spends one to three months on thesis development, market research, and building the target list, then moves into outreach that continues on a rolling basis. Because most approached owners are not actively selling, the timeline depends on when the right owner becomes ready rather than on process mechanics. Buyers who treat acquisition as a continuous program rather than a single project find better assets.
Post-merger integration is the work of actually combining two businesses — systems, processes, teams, culture, and reporting — after the deal closes. It should be planned before signing, not after. Integration planning during diligence surfaces the friction points while you can still price or structure around them, and it forces clarity on what will genuinely be combined versus left alone. Most acquisitions that disappoint do so here rather than at the negotiating table: the thesis was sound and the price was fair, but the two businesses were never really joined.
Contact DBD Investment Bank today to leverage our expertise, dedication, and innovative approach to achieve your strategic goals.
Get in Touch
