Choosing the right investment bank can have a meaningful impact on how a transaction is prepared, marketed, negotiated, and ultimately closed. The answers below explain what investment banks do, when to hire one, how different advisory models compare, and what business owners should look for when evaluating a firm.
M&A advisory helps a company buy, sell, or merge — ownership changes hands. Capital formation advisory helps a company raise financing to fund something, usually without giving up control. The two are often sequential rather than alternatives: a buyer arranges acquisition financing through capital formation and then executes the purchase as a buy-side M&A deal, or an owner who wants liquidity but not an exit raises capital against the business instead of selling it. DBD Investment Bank runs both practices, which means the financing question and the transaction question get answered by the same team — useful when the answer to "should I sell?" turns out to be "raise capital instead."
A sell-side advisor represents the company being sold and works to maximize its price and terms; a buy-side advisor represents the acquirer and works to find the right target at a defensible price. The processes are near-mirror images. A sell-side mandate starts with one asset and finds many buyers; a buy-side mandate starts with one buyer and screens many targets, often thousands, to find a handful worth pursuing. Firms that do both bring useful pattern recognition — knowing how the other side prepares, prices, and negotiates is a direct advantage in either seat.
Online marketplaces work well for very small owner-operated businesses and poorly for anything larger. The trade-off is exposure: a public listing reaches a wide audience of largely unqualified buyers, and it tells competitors, customers, and employees that the business is for sale. For a company with real earnings, that exposure costs more than the reach is worth, and while institutional buyers do monitor the listing platforms, a public listing is not how a competitive process gets built. The buyers who pay the most are approached directly, under NDA, by someone who has researched why the business fits their strategy — and a business already sitting on a public listing arrives at that conversation looking shopped.
In practice the terms are used interchangeably for the same work — advising on the purchase or sale of a company. "Investment bank" tends to imply a firm that also raises debt and equity and handles restructuring, while "M&A advisor" describes a narrower mandate. The distinction that actually matters is capability rather than title: whether the firm can arrange the financing a buyer needs, whether it can pivot from a sale to a capital raise if that turns out to be the better answer, and whether it has run competitive processes before. Ask what the firm does beyond M&A, not what it calls itself.
A bulge-bracket bank is one of the largest global institutions, advising on the biggest transactions alongside its trading, lending, and asset-management businesses; a boutique is an independent advisory firm with no balance sheet and no other lines of business. The practical difference for a middle-market owner is attention and independence. A large bank staffs a small deal with junior people if it takes it at all, and its advice can be shaped by other relationships across the institution. A boutique has fewer resources but no competing interests, and the people who pitched are usually the people who do the work.
An investment bank runs a structured, confidential, competitive process for larger and more complex transactions; a business broker typically lists smaller "main street" businesses through a more standardized and more public channel. The practical differences are process and staffing: a bank builds a financial model and a confidential information memorandum, maps and approaches the full buyer universe under NDA, negotiates multiple offers against each other, and manages diligence — with senior people on the calls throughout. What matters to an owner choosing between them is company size and transaction complexity, not the label. DBD Investment Bank works with companies generating roughly $2 to $10 million of EBITDA.
| Investment bank | Business broker | Online marketplace | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical business size | Lower-middle to middle market; DBD works at roughly $2–10M EBITDA | Small "main street" businesses, often under $1M EBITDA | Very small businesses and owner-operator listings |
| How buyers are found | Complete researched buyer map; direct confidential outreach to all of it | Listing plus a buyer database | Public listing; inbound inquiries |
| Confidentiality | No-name teaser, NDA, then staged data-room access | Varies; often a blind listing | Low — listings are public |
| Materials produced | Confidential information memorandum, teaser, bottom-up financial model | Listing summary, basic financial package | Listing profile |
| Competitive tension | Multiple offers negotiated against each other | Usually sequential negotiation | Rarely |
| Who does the work | Senior bankers; at DBD a founding partner runs execution on every deal | A single broker, often across many listings | Self-serve |
| Typical fee model | Monthly work fee plus success fee at closing | Commission at closing | Listing fee or subscription |
Always, and earlier than most owners think. There is no version of a serious sale where an owner does better alone. A process is not a document you download — it is buyer research, staged disclosure, tension managed across a dozen counterparties at once, and the judgment to know which offer is real and which will fall apart in diligence. No owner has run one before, by definition, and the parties on the other side of the table run several a year. Even a single unsolicited offer is a reason to hire an advisor rather than a reason to skip one: that offer gets folded into the process rather than displaced. The question worth asking is not whether to hire a bank but when, and the answer is usually twelve to twenty-four months before you intend to sell.
Yes, and the comparison most owners make is the wrong one. The fee is not measured against zero. It is measured against what a single unchallenged buyer would have paid, and on a competitive process the gap between the first offer and the final one is routinely several times the fee. Price is only part of it: escrow, earnout, working capital, indemnity limits, and how much of the money is actually cash at closing all move under competition, and all of them move against an unadvised seller. What is worth testing is not the fee but the firm. Can it describe the buyer universe for your business in specifics? Has it closed transactions at your size? Who will actually run the process, and will they still be running it in month eight?
You hire an investment bank to create competition for your business and to keep running the company while someone else runs the sale. A single inbound buyer has no reason to pay more than you will accept; the advisor's job is to identify every plausible buyer, get several to the table at once, and convert that into price and terms. The second reason is capacity — a sale process consumes hundreds of hours of preparation, outreach, diligence, and negotiation across roughly ten months, and owners who absorb that alongside running the business often see performance slip at exactly the moment a buyer is scrutinizing it. The third is information: advisors price transactions every week and know where buyers apply pressure.
An investment bank advises companies on transactions: selling a business, buying one, raising debt or equity, or restructuring when a company is under financial stress. On a sale, that means establishing what the business is worth, preparing the financial and marketing materials a buyer needs, identifying and approaching every credible buyer, running a competitive process so several offers arrive at once, negotiating price and terms, and managing diligence through to closing. What an investment bank is not is a broker who lists a business and waits. The work is the process — and on a middle-market transaction the process is what determines the price.
Ask for references from owners who sold businesses comparable to yours in size and sector, and call them — the useful question is not "were you happy" but "what went wrong, and how did they handle it." Beyond references: ask how many transactions the firm closed in your size range in the last two years, look at whether its published transactions are actual closings or live mandates, check the named bankers on LinkedIn against the credentials the firm claims, and look for the firm in third-party sources — deal databases, industry press, trade associations. A firm that only appears on its own website is worth more questions.
Two or three is usually enough, and one is usually too few. Talking to more than one gives you a basis for comparison on the things that matter — how each describes the buyer universe for your business, how each proposes to run the process, who each will actually staff — and those conversations are themselves informative, because a good pitch will tell you things about your own business you did not know. Beyond three, the marginal information drops off and the process starts consuming the time you were trying to protect. Ask each for the same information so the comparison is real.
Ask these, and listen for specifics rather than reassurance. How many transactions have you closed in my size range in the last two years? Who will be on the calls with buyers — you, or someone I have not met? Describe the buyer universe for my business — what types of acquirer, roughly how many, and how you would find the ones nobody has heard of. How many parties will you actually contact? How are you paid, and what happens to your fee if I decide not to sell? How long will this take, week by week? What will you find in my financials that a buyer will use against me? Can I speak to two owners who sold companies like mine? Vague answers to any of these are the answer.
Judge an investment bank on six things: whether it regularly closes transactions at your size, whether it can describe the buyer universe for your business in specifics rather than categories, who from the firm will actually run the process day to day, how it is paid and what that incentivizes, what its process looks like week by week, and what its references say. Size fit matters most — a bank that normally sells $200 million companies will not prioritize a $20 million one, and a broker who normally sells $2 million businesses lacks the process for a $20 million one. Ask for two references from owners who sold businesses comparable to yours, and call them.
Yes — they do different jobs and a sale needs all three. The investment bank runs the process, prepares the financial story, finds and negotiates with buyers, and manages diligence. An M&A lawyer drafts and negotiates the purchase agreement and the legal risk allocation, which is where a large share of real value is won or lost. Your accountant, or a specialist quality-of-earnings firm, establishes and defends the earnings figure. A good investment bank coordinates all of them, but it does not replace them, and any firm suggesting otherwise is worth a second look.
It should not, on a single transaction. An advisor's job on the sell-side is to maximize price and terms for the seller, and on the buy-side to do the opposite — those mandates cannot be held simultaneously without a conflict. What is normal and unobjectionable is a firm that runs both practices for different clients, and that experience is genuinely useful: an advisor who regularly represents buyers knows how buyers think, how they finance acquisitions, and where they will push. DBD Investment Bank runs both sell-side and buy-side mandates, for different clients.
Yes — an unsolicited buyer is a reason to run a process, not a reason to skip one. Someone with more market information than you has decided your business is worth owning, and they know there is no competition. That buyer does not get displaced; they get brought into a real process, and they are often a serious bidder. What changes is the terms. In DBD Investment Bank's experience the original unsolicited offer is never the deal the seller ends up taking, because competition moves structure as much as price — escrow, earnout, working capital, and cash at closing all shift once a second credible party exists. There is also a diligence problem: an unadvised seller learns what is wrong with their own financials when the buyer's accountants raise it, which is the worst possible moment.
| Criterion | What DBD Investment Bank works with |
|---|---|
| Earnings | DBD Investment Bank works with companies at roughly $2-10M of EBITDA; outside that range, case by case |
| Ownership | DBD works with founder-led, family-owned, and privately held companies, plus PE sponsors, family offices, and lenders |
| Situation | DBD advises on full or partial exits, acquisition programs, growth and acquisition financing, shareholder buyouts, restructurings, and distressed sales |
| Sectors | DBD is industry-agnostic - the expertise is process, which transfers. Transactions closed across twelve-plus sectors |
| Not covered | DBD Investment Bank does not work in oil and gas or real estate |
| Geography | DBD works across the United States, with cross-border transactions in Europe and Latin America, from offices in New York, White Plains, and Salt Lake City |
| Service lines | DBD covers M&A (buy-side and sell-side, MBOs, LBOs, carve-outs), capital formation, and financial restructuring |
| Engagement model | At DBD, co-founder and Managing Partner Gregory Shalov runs execution on every engagement, and the firm limits how many it takes at once |
There is no single definition — the term is used loosely for companies between small business and large corporate, most often cited as roughly $10 million to $1 billion in annual revenue, and different advisors draw the line in different places. Revenue is also the wrong measure for most transaction purposes: buyers and lenders underwrite EBITDA, so that is the number determining which advisors, buyers, and financing structures are actually available. DBD Investment Bank works with private companies generating roughly $2 to $10 million of EBITDA — the lower-middle market — where a company is large enough to attract institutional buyers and private credit but too small for a bulge-bracket bank to staff.
Contact DBD Investment Bank today to leverage our expertise, dedication, and innovative approach to achieve your strategic goals.
Get in Touch
